Thursday, April 15, 2010
Writing Reflection
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
A Truly Selfish Act
“I was born free as Caesar.” [Act I, Scene 2. Line 36] Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare, is about the rise and fall of the ruler, Julius Caesar, and the corruption of the Roman Republic at a time when it was filled with people who were against Caesar and others who supported him. Cassius was one of the people who wasn’t fond of Caesar, and it was he who talked of plotting a conspiracy first. He compares himself to Caesar, this man who had done nothing worthy but became ruler of the Roman Republic, noting that they were equal in terms of achievements. Cassius does not believe Caesar is deserving of the additional power he gained by eliminating Pompey, and, driven by his personal envy and ambition, Cassius is led to conspire against Caesar.
Cassius’s personal envy affects his every thought and decision, resulting him into appearing as an antagonist at first. He is envious of Caesar’s power, especially since he believes Caesar does not deserve it. He compares Caesar to himself and other characters, and then states that there is nothing special about Caesar; that he is equal to everyone else. This envy leads Cassius into being contemptuous, bitter and manipulative. He turns others against Caesar, and primarily manipulates Brutus. Brutus is a well-respected and honorable man who isn’t only respected and trusted by Caesar, but also the whole of Rome. Cassius approaches Brutus during Lupercal, while the two of them are out of Caesar’s earshot. It is here when Cassius first starts to manipulate Brutus into turning against Caesar. He talks about Caesar’s faults; how Caesar is not as Rome sees him and is actually a dependent, cowardly person. Cassius tells Brutus of the time he saved Caesar from drowning in Tiber when there was a storm and the waves were choppy. Cassius proved himself to be more courageous of the two of them and says, “And this man is now become a god, and Cassius is a wretched creature, and must bend his body if Caesar carelessly but nod on him.” [Act I, Scene 2. Lines 114-117] Cassius complains to Brutus that while Caesar had been a coward, and it was Cassius who saved Caesar, Caesar is still the one who gets praised while Cassius must bow down to Caesar as if he was a god. Cassius emphasizes Caesar’s faults and tells Brutus that Caesar is just a mortal and does not deserve to be praised as a god. Therefore, Cassius explains they must work together to take this status away from Caesar. Cassius is not content with only Brutus on his side, and as a result he manipulates others as well, Casca being one of these people. On a stormy night when Casca visits Cassius, Casca talks about his fear of the storm and how this might be an omen that Rome is in danger. But, Cassius thinks otherwise. He sees the storm as an omen that they should indeed kill Caesar for he is the one who is causing Rome to be in grave danger. He again compares Caesar, but this time to himself and Casca, and shows his bewilderment that such an unworthy man deserves such power. “A man no mightier than thyself, or me, in personal action, yet prodigious grown, and fearful, as these strange eruptions are.” [Act I, Scene 3. Lines 76-78] Cassius, in saying this, tells Casca that this man, Caesar, has done nothing awe-inspiring but still receives a formidable reputation, and people fear him as they fear the stormy weather. Cassius, at this point, has not only manipulated Brutus, but Casca as well, and his conspiracy commences as he recruits more people to turn against Caesar. As an overall motivator, Cassius’s envy continues to affect himself and also merges with another motive for killing Caesar: ambition.
Cassius’s ambition influences him to yearn triumph, even though this may make him dishonest and conniving. In order for the conspiracy to be successful, Cassius felt it was necessary to eliminate all possible threats. He wanted triumph over Caesar as he plotted for Caesar to lose not only his status, but his life as well. As Cassius thinks about the tyranny Caesar could cause, Cassius reflects on Caesar’s faults and those around Caesar who may cause for something to go wrong in their plot. His ambition makes him manipulative and dishonest. Cassius, calculating his actions and how others could make his actions seem more honorable, manipulates Brutus since Caesar and Rome respected him. He succeeds in doing so, and in his soliloquy rejoices, knowing Brutus is on his side. “That noble minds keep ever with their likes; for who so firm that cannot be seduc’d? Caesar doth bear me hard; but he loves Brutus.” [Act I, Scene 2. Lines 301-303] Knowing Brutus is a noble man, Cassius predicted that it might be challenging to turn Brutus against Caesar. But with his calculated words, Cassius is able to succeed in doing so and in this soliloquy he says that no one is so incorruptible that they cannot be turned against someone. With Brutus on his side, Caesar will not doubt their actions so much. Cassius’s ambition leads him to being so calculative and wanting to rob Caesar of his power, he makes the noblest of men to turn against Caesar. Cassius wants to make sure that nothing gets in the way of his triumph, and therefore he wants to eliminate all possible threats. As he and the other conspirators talk about their mutiny, he suggests that they kill Antony too. “Let Antony and Caesar fall together.” [Act II, Scene 1. Line 161.] Because Antony is very loyal to Caesar, Cassius sees him as a threat, for he predicts that he will turn against the conspirators and cause chaos. Therefore, he wants Antony to die alongside Caesar. This shows Cassius’s ambition because he wants to make sure he gets overall triumph with nothing getting in the way. He yearns to eliminate all posing threats to fully strip Caesar of his power. Cassius’s ambition is evidence that he, as a schemer, calculates everything that would make his actions seem less suspicious, and that this ambition leads him to aspire for victory over Caesar.
Because Cassius is envious of Caesar, he reflects on all of Caesar’s faults, reasoning that they are evidence Caesar isn’t deserving of this power. His personal envy fuels him to see each of Caesar’s faults, comparing Caesar not only to himself, but to others as well. This makes him contemptuous and conniving, seeking to grab leadership from Caesar. His ambition makes him manipulative and dishonest as he does everything in his power, whether it is noble or not, to gain triumph over Caesar. Overall, Cassius appears to be a very corrupted character, always scheming and always thinking about his own victory. In the end, Cassius only partially achieves his goal because he did eliminate Caesar but he did not gain the power for himself. This was neither a noble nor worthy cause because Cassius mainly wanted to strip Caesar of his power because he was envious, not because he wanted it for the good of others. Therefore, it appears that his plot to overthrow Caesar was mainly for himself without having the good of others in mind.
Empathy Is Still Needed
Identify and discuss some of the creative elements of your collage.
How did you use the images and text that you selected to highlight your understanding of the Lost Boy’s situation?
Explain how your collage creates awareness for the Lost Boys’ plight.
Explain how you think your collage demonstrated empathy and might evoke an emotional response from your viewers and/or incite them to act.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
The Obstacles Just Don't Seem To End
Peter Dut was one of the Lost Boys who was migrated to the
With his income, it was challenging to balance supporting himself and the people in
The journey was very challenging for the Peter and the Lost Boys, and each step forward just seemed to be another obstacle. It seemed as if the obstacles never ended. But with Peter’s persistence, he was able to keep moving forward. Peter Dut struggled through times of chaos, and with his persistence and hard work, he survived the storm and the skies gradually became clearer and clearer for him.
Videos of the Darfurians in the refugee camp in Kenya:
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Julius Caesar Duet Acting
This passage is significant because the two succumb to the pressure of worries caused by the war, causing a tension in their friendship. Throughout the whole play, Brutus has been collected, not letting stress overcome him. But with his wife's death and the war breaking out because of the conspiracy, Brutus falls apart and takes it out on his friend Cassius, who on his part has also done Brutus wrong. But after realizing that they had been through a lot with each other, they forgive and forget about the argument, knowing the importance of their friendship. This passage truly proves that even under circumstances as such, even if you approach a bump in the road, friends will help you through, staying by your side as long as you need them.
Act IV, Scene 3. Lines 38-122.
Brutus Hear me, for I will speak.
Must I give way and room to your rash choler?
Shall I be frighted when a madman stares?
Cassius O ye gods, ye gods! Must I endure all this?
Brutus All this? ay, more; fret till your proud heart break;
Go show your slaves how choleric you are,
And make your bondmen tremble. Must I budge?
Must I observe you? Must I stand and crouch
Under your testy humour? By the gods,
You shall digest the venom of your spleen,
Though it do split you; for, from this day forth,
I'll use you for my mirth, yea, for my laughter,
When you are waspish.
Cassius Is it come to this?
Brutus You say you are a better soldier:
Let it appear so; make your vaunting true,
And it shall please me well. For mine own part,
I shall be glad to learn of noble men.
Cassius You wrong me every way; you wrong me, Brutus.
I said, an elder soldier not a better;
Did I say better?
Brutus If you did, I care not.
Cassius When Caesar liv'd, he durst not thus have mov'd me.
Brutus Peace, peace! you durst not so have tempted him.
Cassius I durst not?
Brutus No.
Cassius What? durst not tempt him?
Brutus For your life you durst not.
Cassius Do not presume too much upon my love.
I may do that I shall be sorry for.
Brutus You have done that you should be sorry for.
There is not error, Cassius in your threats;
For I am arm'd so strong in honesty
That they pass by me as the idle wind,
Which I respect not. I did send to you
For certain sums of gold, which you denied me:
For I can raise no money by vile means:
By heaven, I had rather coin my heart,
And drop my blood for drachmas, than to wring
From the hard hands of peasants their vile trash
By any indirection: I did send
To you for gold to pay my legions,
Which you denied me: was that done like Cassius?
Should I have answer'd Caius Cassius so?
When Marcus Brutus grows so covetous,
To lock such rascal counters from his friends,
Be ready, gods, with all your thunderbolts;
Dash him to pieces!
Cassius I denied you not.
Brutus You did.
Cassius I did not: he was but a fool that brought
My answer back. Brutus hath riv’d my heart:
A friend should bear his friend's infirmities,
But Brutus makes mine greater than they are.
Brutus I do not, till you practise them on me.
Cassius You love me not.
Brutus I do not like your faults.
Cassius A friendly eye could never see such faults.
Brutus A flatterer's would not, though they do appear
As huge as high Olympus.
Cassius Come, Antony, and young Octavius, come,
Revenge yourselves alone on Cassius,
For Cassius is aweary of the world;
Hated by one he loves; brav’d by his brother;
Check'd like a bondman; all his faults observed,
Set in a note-book, learn'd, and conn'd by rote,
To cast into my teeth. O, I could weep
My spirit from mine eyes! There is my dagger,
And here my naked breast; within, a heart
Dearer than Plutus' mine, richer than gold:
If that thou be'st a Roman, take it forth;
I, that denied thee gold, will give my heart:
Strike, as thou didst at Caesar; for, I know,
When thou didst hate him worst, thou lovedst him better
Than ever thou lovedst Cassius.
Brutus Sheathe your dagger:
Be angry when you will, it shall have scope;
Do what you will, dishonour shall be humour.
O Cassius, you are yoked with a lamb
That carries anger as the flint bears fire;
Who, much enforced, shows a hasty spark,
And straight is cold again.
Cassius Hath Cassius lived
To be but mirth and laughter to his Brutus,
When grief, and blood ill-temper'd, vexeth him?
Brutus When I spoke that, I was ill-temper'd too.
Cassius Do you confess so much? Give me your hand.
Brutus And my heart too.
Cassius O Brutus!
Brutus What's the matter?
Cassius Have not you love enough to bear with me,
When that rash humour which my mother gave me
Makes me forgetful?
Brutus Yes, Cassius; and, from henceforth,
When you are over-earnest with your Brutus,
He'll think your mother chides, and leave you so.
Brutus: Sam
Cassius: Izzy
Monday, November 23, 2009
To Know Everything Is To Know Nothing
Art is a snapshot of society painted by the hands of geniuses. Unlike a snapshot with the click of a camera, it isn’t just the picture seen generally. Painted art consists of the artist’s feelings implied in the picture itself. Therefore, as the painting grows in life and color, so do the feelings in it. The feelings of the painter, another person who is part of the society. The painter’s feelings are communicated through messages in strokes, details, and emotions lingering in the art. Essentially, the viewer will be able to read these messages, and even though they may or may not be able to connect with the painter’s feelings, it is that one more person’s input on his or her view of society that more people, as they gaze at the painting, can explore and take account of. From the audience’s point of view, they are able to see the scene from another person’s perspective.
Obviously back in the Renaissance, cameras had not been invented yet; therefore the only means of taking a snapshot of a scene would have been through art. Therefore, each scene is painted with such precision and care as to show every detail. Overall, the details combined create the bigger picture, but if examined carefully and closely, the details all have hidden messages in them as well. It doesn’t have to be the drawing itself, but the colors and how the object is represented have effects too. For example, Aristotle and his master Plato are presented to be the focal point of the painting “The School of Athens.” Aristotle’s clothes are blue and brown, the colors of the ocean and Earth, elements that are held down by gravity. This is significant to the representation of Aristotle because his studies were more tangible, as opposed to Plato’s more spiritual studies that were not experimental.
In this artwork, Raphael’s idea was to put all the geniuses who had contributed greatly to knowledge, under one roof. In that case, this painting would be a humanist’s dream. The RenProxy-Connection: keep-alive
Cache-Control: max-age=0
ssance was a time of rebirth of knowledge, where people inquired more about subjects, as opposed to relying only on the Church’s answers. In the Renaissance, people had been able to explore about subjects such as anatomy, science, math, art, and others. But it was through their curiosity and inquiry that people stumbled upon scientific explanations, rather than religious explanations being their only resource. Therefore, with all the geniuses under one roof, this painting represents the Renaissance greatly because these geniuses discovered and contributed greatly to the knowledge that was studied and built upon in the Renaissance. Art mirrors society not only in the big picture seen at first glance, but also by the actions of the people in the painting, and the implied feelings of the painter, a person part of society his or herself. Art mirrors society’s thoughts as well as actions, completing the picture overall.
If I were to be someone in Raphael's painting of the geniuses, I would be Socrates. He was a Greek philosopher, who took on to Plato's studies of the abstract and intangible. His greatest contributions were logic and epistemology, the theory of knowledge. Socrates once said, "All I know is that I know nothing." The more one knows, the more that person doesn't know. As people gain more knowledge, the less knowledge they have. An answer leads to another question, and therefore as you learn more and more, you start to question things more and more, therefore you have less answers to your questions. In the end, you are left with gained knowledge that leaves you to lack of knowledge. Apart from his theory of knowledge, Socrates was a man of arguments and contradiction. The Socratic Method is a form of debate, and Socratic paradoxes contradict with themselves. An example of a Socratic paradox would be his famous quote, "I know I am intelligent because I know that I know nothing." In this sentence, Socrates contradicts the idea of knowing anything with the idea of knowing nothing in the process of learning more and more. So not only was he a man of logic and epistemology, but also of arguments.
Like Socrates, I argue a lot, with valid reasons to support my arguments. This is evident in Humanities itself, in the Socratic seminars we have. I find myself participating a lot during these seminars, arguing or agreeing with others' ideas. When arguing, I have reasons to support my statements, and although others may not agree or understand my statements, I myself have a valid reason to support it. But I can relate most to Socrates because I have a profound side, in which I question knowledge. My cousin once said to me, "The more you know, the more you don't know." And it was then that it hit me. This is a true statement. We will never stop inquiring about subjects as soon as we start to learn about them. I was able to grasp the idea of not knowing anything as we learn more, and from then on, I questioned knowledge. It is best, at times, to not learn anything about a certain subject, as to not question it any longer. Logic is essential to life, as it is applied to almost everything we do. Therefore, I believe that I need to develop my logic, which is why when it comes to logical thinking, I try my best to understand the concepts, just like Socrates. Like Socrates, I understand what I know, and I know that to know everything, is to know nothing.
Friday, October 30, 2009
Dare To Stand Out
The Alchemist reminds me of another book, Stargirl, written by Jerry Spinelli. In this book, the main character's name is Stargirl. Her name alone reflects her bizarre personality. She stands out in the crowd, her vivacious personality propelling her to talk to students she doesn't know. Unfortunately, she's not accepted by anyone. But a boy named Leo takes the time to befriend her, and later becomes her boyfriend.
An important trait Stargirl possesses is persistence.